ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the effect of vestibular rehabilitation and to identify factors that can affect rehabilitation outcomes. Methods: From December 2018 to October 2020, patients who underwent vestibular rehabilitation in the Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University were prospectively followed up. A battery of vestibular function examinations and psychological status evaluations were applied before and after rehabilitation initiation. The main outcomes were vertigo/dizziness and unsteadiness, measured by visual analogue scale (VAS); Secondary outcomes were daily activities and participation, assessed by vestibular activities and participation measure (VAP). Paired t-test was used to compare the effects before and after rehabilitation. Binary logistic regressions were applied to analyze the influencing factors of rehabilitation outcomes. Results: A total sample of 171 patients was followed up regularly with a median time of 11 months. Of the 171 patients evaluated, 72 were males and 99 were females; age ranged from 10 to 89 years old with a median age of 55 years old. At 6-month follow-up, the difference of VAS score of vertigo/dizziness and unsteadiness pre-post rehabilitation was 1.79±1.80 and 1.56±1.76, respectively; The difference of activity and participation domain of VAP score was 2.51±13 and 1.27±3.75, respectively. All differences pre-post rehabilitation exhibited statistically significant with P values<0.01. Regression analysis demonstrated that the length of symptom onset was a significant predictor of poor balance recovery (OR=6.52; 95%CI:2.10, 20.27). Visual dependence (OR=5.44; 95%CI: 1.38, 21.47) and suspectable anxiety (OR=6.45; 95%CI: 1.49, 28.30) were identified as risk factors for poor recovery of vertigo/dizziness. Conclusions: Vestibular rehabilitation effectively reduces dizziness, promotes balance, and improves the function of daily activities. Time from the onset, visual dependence and suspectable anxiety are the main factors hindering a desirable rehabilitation outcome.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anxiety , Dizziness , Treatment Outcome , Vertigo , Vestibule, LabyrinthABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the characteristics of dynamic balance during the onset of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and its prediction of residual symptoms after successful repositioning. Methods: From January 2018 to August 2019, patients diagnosed with unilateral posterior semicircular canal or horizontal semicircular canal BPPV were consecutively enrolled from five otolaryngology clinics in Shanghai. The dynamic balance function was measured by sensory organization test (SOT) before repositioning maneuver, and the residual symptoms and its duration were followed up from one week to up to three months. Results: A total of 260 patients were recruited. After excluding 17 cases, 243 cases were successfully followed up including 89 males and 154 females, with an average age of (52.9±13.0) years. There were 175 cases of posterior semicircular BPPV, 61 cases of horizontal semicircular BPPV and 7 cases of canal conversion (from horizontal to posterior semicircular). Among 243 patients, 118 cases reported residual symptoms, with an incidence of 48.6%. The results of SOT showed that 58.0%(141/243) of the patients had abnormal vestibular input and 41.6%(101/243) were categorized as "near falls". With respect to the detailed residual symptoms, 47 cases (39.8%) reported unsteadiness or floating, 35 cases (29.7%) had fogginess/heaviness feeling, 22 cases (18.6%) had transient dizzy while head moving, and 15 cases (12.7%) reported that the symptom was too subtle to describe. Compared with the group without residual symptoms, the group with residual symptoms had more abnormal vestibular input(χ²=67.25, P<0.001) and near falls(χ²=74.78, P<0.001) as identified by SOT test. Cox proportional hazards regression failed to reveal any SOT results having significantly impact on the duration of residual symptoms [abnormal vestibular input (HR= 0.93, 95%CI: 0.48, 1.80), and near falls (HR= 0.90, 95%CI: 0.56, 1.46)]. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the duration of residual symptoms among patients with different SOT manifestations [Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, P>0.05]. Conclusions: The impaired dynamic balance during the onset of BPPV is characterized by "abnormal vestibular input". The residual symptoms are mainly characterized by unsteadiness or floating feeling. The defect of dynamic balance function is a predictor of the residual symptoms after successful repositioning, but not for the duration of such symptoms.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo , China , Dizziness , Prospective Studies , Semicircular CanalsABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effects of different intervention strategies for the management of residual dizziness following successful canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Methods: A total of 129 BPPV patients with residual dizziness following successful CRP were recruited during January 2019 and July 2019. They were randomly assigned into three groups with 43 cases in each group: the vestibular rehabilitation group received rehabilitation training for four weeks; betahistine group was given orally 12 mg betahistine three times a day for four weeks; and the control group had no specific treatment. The primary outcomes were daily activities and social participation assessed by the Vestibular Activities and Participation measure (VAP). Secondary outcomes includedbalance function assessed by sensory organization test (SOT) and the duration of residual symptoms. Stata15.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The scores of VAP in the three groups decreased over time, but a more significant decrease was found in vestibular rehabilitation group. Further paired comparison showed that the difference between the vestibular rehabilitation group and the control group was of statistical significance (B=-3.88, χ2=18.29, P<0.01), while the difference between the betahistine group and the control group was not statistically significant (B=-0.96, χ2=1.16, P=0.28). The balance function of the three groups showed a trend of recovery over time, with no significant differences between groups (χ2=1.37, df=2, P>0.05). The median duration of residual dizziness for both vestibular rehabilitation and betahistine groups was 14 days, while that of control group was 19 days, with no significant difference between three groups[Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test; χ2=1.82, df=2, P=0.40]. Conclusion: Vestibular rehabilitation can significantly improve the daily activities and social participation function in BPPV patients with residual symptoms following successful CRP, but its effects on shortening the duration of residual symptoms and promoting the recovery of balance function remain uncertain.